A heads-up for the squeamish: this post is about low-carbon birding. Well,
kind of...
The topic first appeared on this blog about a year ago. More than two years
prior to that, in April 2018, Javier Caletrío's 'BB eye' piece, 'Are We Addicted to High-Carbon Ornithology?' was published in British Birds. So the conversation had been going on for quite a while before I joined in.
The fact is, although I was aware of the discussion, for a long time I had no
interest in engaging in it. When I wrote that NQS post, 'The Elephant in the Room', Javier's
Twitter page
had a paltry 899 followers. It now has 1,575. Better, but clearly many birders
are still not willing to talk about low-carbon birding. Like I wasn't.
So, briefly, I want to outline what changed my mind...
In February 2020 I wrote a post entitled 'The Twitching Thing'. Although I haven't been an active twitcher for decades, essentially it was
a tribute to twitching. Written in the light of impending Covid-19 it was
meant to be an upbeat post, and this was the closing paragraph:
'One occasionally sees twitchers getting knocked, and twitching itself
dismissed as some kind of less worthy activity. I think this is very unfair.
In my experience at least, twitching has rarely been about a number, but
rather about a bird, a location, and good company. That is the magic mix,
and it can truly be enormous fun. Why knock it? If there's one thing all of
us need in this world, it's a bit of light relief..'
As usual I promoted that post on Twitter. But among the comments I received were
two killjoy efforts which basically said, 'What about climate change?' The implication was
obvious. Twitching is a high-carbon activity which impacts negatively upon our
environment, so should I really be singing its praises? I am pretty sure that
one of those comments was from Javier, the other from Norfolk birder
Tim Allwood. I
responded like many do when faced with something they don't much like. I
ignored them.
But the point had been made, and got me thinking...
I'm not blind to the parlous state of the world but have zero confidence that
mankind will fix it. However, I'm a relatively old bloke, and younger
generations deserve a crack. They don't need us lot setting a rubbish example.
So, okay, low-carbon birding then. I was willing to talk about it at least. It
took a while, but cue 'The Elephant in the Room' about four months later.
And what was it that got me involved initially? A couple of mildly provocative
tweets. I say 'mildly provocative', but others might say annoying, irritating,
or worse. Tim is still at it on a regular basis, and I have seen him told on
Twitter that he will 'never change people's behaviours by telling them off'',
by someone who has 'studied campaigning theory professionally'. Well,
presumably I am a rare exception to that rule.
Anyway, what exactly has prompted this post? This Twitter exchange, earlier
today...
So, there's Tim getting in with a mildly provocative tweet once again,
and a not untypical response. More often though I think it's fair to say Tim
meets with silence. As in my case. But now there is an opportunity to engage.
How does it go?
Like this...
I have never met Tim, and certainly don't know Josh. However, assuming what I
glean from the internet is correct, Tim is a teacher, probably in his 40s (??
- hope I'm not doing him a disservice there) and Josh is a 22 year-old
conservation student and president of Nottingham Trent University's
Conservation Society. I think I get what Tim is doing - using whatever means
he can to engage birders in the low-carbon birding discussion. And if being a bit in-your-face is what it takes, so be it. In this case
his approach is 'moaning' and 'ruining other people's posts'. I have also seen
it described as 'preaching'. Whatever you call it doesn't really matter. What
matters is the nature of the response. And low-carbon birding appears to be
something few are willing to talk about, fewer still to embrace. Doesn't bode well really, does it?
Also today I was skimming through a certain birder's Twitter page. It was exactly like so-o-o-o-o many others. In reverse
chronological order the last two months went like this:
Western Sandpiper, Pacific Golden Plover,
Oriental Turtle Dove, Elegant Tern,
Black-browed Albatross, Roller, Lesser Grey Shrike,
River Warbler, Great Reed Warbler. That's some fair old mileage
there. There was a bit of local birding too, but basically it was one long list of
twitches. To be fair, if Twitter had existed 35 years ago my page would have looked quite
similar to that, but in the mid-1980s we were less aware of the cumulative
consequences of such activity, and less still the dire state of things globally.
I mentioned earlier that I have zero confidence in mankind's ability to fix
things. The above illustrates why.