Moth-wise the last three nights have been relatively quiet, yet still the new ones come. And, typically, of four new species for the garden, three are micro-moths. I do like micros. When I first started moth trapping a year ago, they were such a daunting prospect. Too small, too many, too similar was my initial impression. But that is not always true. And besides, through a lens even the little ones are frequently transformed into something rather amazing. So I made an effort.
However, learning the micros is made even more challenging than it already is,
on account of their names. For someone whose natural history interests have
rarely required learning scientific names, the tsunami of micro-moth
nomenclature was a bit overwhelming. Clearly it was a plot by lepidopteral
elitists to prevent the hoi polloi from getting above themselves. I struggled
on for a couple of months, then kicked off a bit. The resultant
NQS post
makes me chuckle now. Although it was meant to be tongue-in-cheek, it reads
like someone chucking their toys out of the pram. Anyway, I'm well over it
now, and have found that learning the scientific names is just another element
of the challenge. And it's almost fun. Almost.
I just hope I never have to say them in public though, because my pronunciation of many will be dubious, to say the least.
Saturday night, 1st July
54 moths of 34 species. For the first time in ages, none new for year or garden.
I must admit, from wing shape alone I wondered if this was a
Currant Pug, but in the end have gone for Wormwood Pug.
Hopefully that's indeed what it is. |
Sunday night, 2nd July
52 moths of 27 species; five of which new for year, and three new for garden.
New for the garden. There are no Bridport area records of this species
on Living Record, so probably a good 'un. There isn't much
Heather around here either. |
I was dead chuffed to catch a new Plume moth for the garden. This
one is very small too, with just 17mm wingspan. |
Monday night, 3rd July
73 moths of 35 species; four new for year, one new for garden.
The highlight of last night's trap was sitting on the uppermost egg tray. I recognised it instantly, which might seem odd for such an unspectacular moth. But Small Mottled Willow is a migrant which features quite regularly on Twitter, and I have seen umpteen pics of it in characteristic rolled-up resting pose. I was half-expecting one last year but it never came, despite 2022 being an excellent year for migrants. So it's been on my radar. Still, we're hardly inundated with migrants right now, so it was a very nice surprise...
Small Mottled Willow. In fully relaxed mode it is more rolled-up
than this. As specimens go, this one seems quite poorly marked. |
On Living Record, Small Mottled Willow appears to be on a par
with Bordered Straw in the Bridport area, with nine or ten
records of each. Mind you, we caught Bordered Straw four times in
2022! |
Small Blood-vein is a regular visitor, but rarely as fresh as
this one. |
First Drinker of the year. Spectacular things, like a tiny
Hedgehog. |
The 2023 garden tally now stands at 324, including aggregates. I am seriously
beginning to wonder if 500 in a year might be possible here...
When I started, no one used vernacular names... and my county recorder probably still wouldn't accept records without the scientific names. I find that remembering the names is less challenging than identifying the things in the first place. I had a Z isertana in my garden the other day and I had to use AI to get started with the ID! Once I'd cottoned on to the very curved costa of Zeiraphera, that helped.
ReplyDeleteYep, I'm getting there with the names. With quite a few now, I can visualise the moth too. Progress!
DeletePS. Thanks for the Zeiraphera tip. I hadn't twigged the curved costa. 👍
Surely Gav you'd rather say 'isertana' as Cocks Head Bell End or what ever? The moth English names have been around for centuries and are almost poetic, but the newer Micro English names are just grim...Some birders, its mostly birders, think they will change the world by the enforced use of the vernacular but almost all end up swimming upstream before realising lacunana is better than Common Marble ( more confusion with the Carpets) or lacticolella rather than Wakely's Dowd or London Dowd ( they cant even agree which!) :) Pronunciation aside, these common latin names just trip off the tongue as easy as Acrocephalus, Calidrid or Tristis...
ReplyDeleteYep, definitely isertana. 😄
DeleteScientific names are my default for almost all micros now. I've been assimilated into the Collective. 😉
I hear that the new edition of Sterling and Parsons will be out before Xmas, and includes vernacular names (new ones?) but that might just be a rumour I guess...
*Heather Sober! Really...:))
ReplyDeleteYeah, I know... 🙄
DeleteAagh - you keep trapping species I've been after for ages! Hemp Agrimony Plume looks fantastic. I've been hoping to find it ever since I learned what Hemp Agrimony looks like! Another great post and more great moths. Really enjoying it. All the best. Matt.
ReplyDeleteAh, sorry Matt! Hope Hemp-agrimony Plume comes your way soon. Didn't find it that easy to ID. Took me while to eliminate Citron Plume. As you say though, smart little thing.
DeleteMany thanks for the kind words too. 😊 👍