When I saw my first Cirl Bunting in 1978 - at West Wycombe in Bucks -
the UK population was in serious decline. By 1990 there were just 100 or so
pairs remaining, all in South Devon. Conservation efforts turned the tide at
this point, but more than a decade later it was still necessary to travel west
of the River Exe to guarantee seeing one, and the species' gradual recovery
has always seemed painfully slow. Yes, certainly its range was expanding, but
it never felt likely that I would encounter Cirl Bunting close to home
in Seaton, East Devon any time soon, and even less so here in Bridport, West
Dorset. And then, on 1st January 2021, I took this ropey photo at West
Bexington...
|
Female Cirl Bunting, West Bexington, 1st Jan 2021
|
Unbeknown to me, Mike Morse had seen and photographed the same bird earlier in
the day. And our suspicions were correct; it was a female Cirl Bunting.
Since then the species has become an increasingly familiar sight locally, with
breeding proven last summer. Along with a successful pair on Portland, they were the first Cirl Buntings to breed in Dorset for more than 50 years.
And this week, successful breeding has been proven once again. Great news!
Full details will be forthcoming later in the year...
The local Cirls can be amazingly elusive, but in the spring I had a
jammy encounter with this male as it quietly fed on tiny grass seeds...
|
Male Cirl Bunting
|
Those are photographs I would never have predicted taking locally. What
a treat to have this species close by.
In other news...
Shortly after embarking on my mothing apprenticeship I had a little vent on
here about my struggles to get to grips with scientific names. All moths are
blessed with them of course, but most so-called micro-moths are also typically
known by them. I realise that many branches of natural history deal
almost exclusively in scientific names, and anyone wishing to dip a toe will
simply have to get on with it. Still, I would not be surprised to learn that
some folk find it all too daunting, and so don't even try. Ironically, with
micro-moths someone did attempt to make it all a bit more accessible by giving
them vernacular names too. However, despite some limited take-up (for example,
Nick Asher's Common Micro-moths of Berkshire includes them) there
appeared to be strong aversion to their universal adoption.
Enter Phil Sterling and Mark Parsons, writers of the
Field Guide to the Micro-moths of Great Britain and Ireland. In the excellent second edition there is a section in the introduction
entitled 'Vernacular names'. There we read...
Vernacular names...appear to be welcomed and despised in equal
measure!...For the second edition we decided to review vernacular names,
with a view to including a revised list that we hope will be more widely
accepted, changing those names that seemed inappropriate...We hope that
these vernaculars will encourage new interest in micro-moths among people
who are put off by scientific names...
What a refreshing attitude.
True, perseverence has given me a sketchy familiarity with the scientific
names of many micros, but it hasn't changed my view that insisting on their
use is a bit blinkered, and off-putting for the non-specialist. I must admit
though, until recently I found it difficult to rationalise this view in a way
that came across as something more reasoned than stubborn resistance.
Enter the grandchildren. Like any good grandparent, I am trying to interest my
granddaughters in the natural world. Moths have already played a part, and
both girls are fascinated by them...
|
Elephant Hawk-moth gets reverential admiration.
|
Elephant, hawk and moth are all words which even a four or five-year-old can
grasp; Deilephila elpenor, not so much. So yes, I am glad we call it Elephant Hawk-moth. How
about this next one?
|
Ypsolopha sequella
|
This attractive little micro-moth is very distinctive and easy to recognise.
However, not for one second would I consider encouraging my granddaughter to
call it Ypsolopha sequella - and no, sweetheart, that begins
with a 'Y', not an 'I' - because the vernacular fits like a glove...
|
Pied Rabbit Moth
|
The vernacular even gives you the opportunity to teach the meaning of a new
word perhaps - pied.
Personally I am now comfortable using either name, but have never bothered to
investigate the etymological roots of 'ypsolopha' and 'sequella'. So, to me
they are just meaningless words that when combined become the scientific name of
a striking micro-moth. And I could say something similar about almost all the
scientific names in my mothy lexicon.
Yes, I hope the vernaculars gain traction. They deserve to.