A very nice #LocalBigYear tick early this morning, on the river at West Bay...
|
|
|
Yep. A humble Kingfisher. |
The fact that it has taken me until October to see this species probably says more about me than it does about the local status of Kingfisher. A nice surprise though, and the second time in recent days that this very spot has produced a decent local bird...
|
|
|
Yep. A humble Gadwall. |
That was Monday morning. Apart from winter birds on the West Bexington Mere, and a couple of spring seawatch records, I cannot think of any other local Gadwall I've seen this year.
So, Kingfisher and Gadwall. Common enough birds, but here, not common. With future birding intentions being even more locally focused, the value of both species is going to appreciate.
Quite often, when certain birders (sometimes me) bang on about the joys of keeping local - and especially when they reference that inflammatory term 'low-carbon birding' - a common retort goes something like this:
'Yes, it's alright for you, living on the coast, with terrific birding on your doorstep. Try inland birding, pal, and see how you like that.'
Okay, how do you quantify 'terrific birding'?
Number of species? Last year I tried pretty hard and notched up 165, including a plastic eagle. This year I'm on 159 so far. And that's a pretty extensive stretch of coast I've included. Next year it will shrink. I suspect there are a fair few inland areas of similar size that can match or beat those numbers.
Numbers of rare and scarce birds? Last year I saw Laughing Gull and Tawny Pipit. Those are the BB rarities. Plus a handful of scarcities. In the last 21 months I can think of Lesser Scaup, Woodchat Shrike, Melodious Warbler, Quail, Stone-curlew, Yellow-browed Warbler (does that even count these days?), Caspian Gull (does that?) and...er...I'm struggling now. West Dorset is not Spurn. Admittedly it is not suburban London either, but again, I would imagine a few inland sites can trounce that collection.
Aesthetic appeal of surroundings? Fair enough, you've got me there.
Surely the real measure of what is 'terrific birding' is whatever keeps you happy and content? As I get older I am finding it easier and easier to be satisfied with my birding lot. That doesn't mean I don't frequently wish there were more and 'better' birds - like we all do - rather that I am not constantly subject to the pull of so-called greener grass. It is a very nice place to be, but I have no idea how I got here. Is it an age thing? Experience? Pitiful lack of ambition? Don't know. Don't care. But I do recommend it.
Yesterday's NQS post comfortably notched up several times the usual number of views. All credit for that must go to birding Twitter's version of car-crash TV. What a ruckus! As the dust settles, will the scene look any different? I doubt it. The show will go on, I'm sure. Perhaps the stage will lose some players though. I wonder how many of those involved in (or witness to) recent Shetland shenanigans will rue the day...
Also, I suppose we can expect a lot more reticence re ill-judged Twittery. Sadly.







